 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like a person doesn't feel bad enough not posting fic, it seems the calendar itself is set on making it worse! Everywhere I look, it's the day my phone bill needs to be paid, the day I have a meeting, the expiration date on my milk... 1/12/12, 2/1/12, 2/12/12... Sheesh, Universe, I get it already! But they do say that what you're doing at midnight on New Year's will set the tone for what you'll be doing for the rest of the year, so I made sure I was writing when the calendar rolled over. That'll probably work as well as November magically finishing novellas for me, but a girl can hope, right? (but why don't i post haven in the meantime? because i'd just use it as an excuse not to write long-fic. not like it was left at a cliffhanger or anything.) Tags: antiupdate, gw
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Say I had an AU. And say the boys had an ally, and say I named this ally something like Dekim Barton or Quinze. Would you automatically assume/guess that this ally was secretly a bad guy ready to betray their confidence? Does it make it less fun, being able to see the 'obvious'? Or would it make it less fun if it turned out that he really was a staunch ally, and that you'd just wasted all that fic-energy in trying to read signs that weren't there? If, for instance, I had a character named Treize, and a character named Mariemaia, and they did not appear to be related, but their ages were right, and Treize was in reasonable proximity to Mariemaia's family, would you spend all this time thinking/wondering if Treize was actually Mariemaia's father? Would it be better if I just said outright in the notes, nope, no relation, so you didn't have to think about it, or would it just be cheating to use these two characters in unrelated roles? Tags: funfact, gw
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=92.1){kind=small}
turnippatch's journal
Previous
